Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 04:57

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Which animal has the best sense of smell? - Live Science
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How AI chatbots keep you chatting - TechCrunch
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Inbox: This will be a tough roster to crack - Green Bay Packers
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Real TikTokers are pretending to be Veo 3 AI creations for fun, attention - Ars Technica
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Morning vs evening: What’s the best time to take blood pressure medicine? - Times of India
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
2 dead in Las Vegas Strip shooting, with suspect known but not yet arrested, police say - ABC News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.